top of page
  • Writer's pictureFaron

Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Criteria

What Are Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Criteria?

Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) criteria are a set of standards for a company’s operations that socially conscious investors use to screen potential investments. Environmental criteria consider how a company performs as a steward of nature. Social criteria examine how it manages relationships with employees, suppliers, customers, and the communities where it operates. Governance deals with a company’s leadership, executive pay, audits, internal controls, and shareholder rights.


How Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Criteria Work

Investors (notably younger generations) have, in recent years, shown interest in putting their money where their values are. As a result, brokerage firms and mutual fund companies have started offering exchange traded funds (ETFs) and other financial products that follow ESG criteria.


Robo-advisors, such as Betterment and Wealthfront, have used them to appeal to these investors. According to the most recent report from US SIF Foundation, investors held $17.1 trillion in assets chosen according to ESG criteria at the beginning of 2020, up from $12 trillion just two years earlier.1


Human influence is unequivocally to blame for the warming of the planet and some forms of climate disruption are now locked in for centuries, according to a report from the U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.2 "This report must sound a death knell for coal and fossil fuels, before they destroy our planet," said United Nations Secretary General Antonio Guterres.

ESG investing is sometimes referred to as sustainable investing, responsible investing, impact investing, or socially responsible investing (SRI). To assess a company based on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) criteria, investors look at a broad range of behaviors.


Demand for ESG investments soared in 2020. Nearly 60% of respondents to an Investopedia and Treehugger survey indicated an increase in interest in ESG investments and 19% reported incorporating ESG standards into their portfolios.


Types of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Criteria

There are three key parts to ESG investing—the environmental, social, and governance aspects.

Environmental

Environmental criteria may include a company’s energy use, waste, pollution, natural resource conservation, and treatment of animals. The criteria can also be used in evaluating any environmental risks a company might face and how the company is managing those risks.


For example, there might be issues related to its ownership of contaminated land, its disposal of hazardous waste, its management of toxic emissions, or its compliance with government environmental regulations.


Social

Social criteria look at the company’s business relationships. Does it work with suppliers that hold the same values as it claims to hold? Does the company donate a percentage of its profits to the local community or encourage employees to perform volunteer work there? Do the company’s working conditions show high regard for its employees’ health and safety? Are other stakeholders’ interests taken into account?


Governance

About governance, investors may want to know that a company uses accurate and transparent accounting methods and that stockholders are allowed to vote on important issues.


They may also want assurances that companies avoid conflicts of interest in their choice of board members, don't use political contributions to obtain unduly favorable treatment and, of course, don't engage in illegal practices.


No single company may pass every test in every category, of course, so investors need to decide what's most important to them and do the research.


Special Considerations

On a practical level, investment firms that follow ESG criteria must also set priorities. For example, Boston-based Trillium Asset Management, with $4.8 billion under management as of Sept. 2021, uses a selection of ESG factors to help identify companies positioned for strong long-term performance.3


Determined in part by analysts who identify issues facing different sectors and industries, Trillium's ESG criteria include avoiding:


  • Companies that operate in higher-risk areas or have exposure to coal or hard rock mining, nuclear or coal power, private prisons, agricultural biotechnology, tobacco, tar sands, or weapons and firearms.

  • Or companies that have major or recent controversies with human rights, animal welfare, environmental concerns, governance issues, or product safety.


Things that Trillium seeks out, or considers positive ESG criteria, include:


Environment

  • Companies that put out carbon or sustainability reports

  • Limits harmful pollutants and chemicals

  • Seeks to lower greenhouse gas emissions

  • Uses renewable energy sources

Social

  • Companies that operate an ethical supply chain

  • Supports LGBTQ rights and encourages diversity

  • Has policies to protect against sexual misconduct

  • Pays fair wages

Governance

  • Companies that embrace diversity on their board

  • Embraces corporate transparency

  • Employs a CEO independent of the board chair4


Pros and Cons of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Criteria

In years past, socially responsible investments had a reputation for requiring a tradeoff on the investor's part. Because they limited the universe of companies that were eligible for investment, they also limited the investor's potential profit. "Bad" companies sometimes performed very well, at least in terms of their stock price.


More recently, however, some investors have come to believe that environmental, social, and governance criteria have a practical purpose beyond any ethical concerns. By following ESG criteria they may be able to avoid companies whose practices could signal a risk factor—as evidenced by BP's (BP) 2010 oil spill and Volkswagen's emissions scandal, both of which rocked the companies' stock prices and resulted in billions of dollars in associated losses.


As ESG-minded business practices gain more traction, investment firms are increasingly tracking their performance. Financial services companies such as JPMorgan Chase (JPM), Wells Fargo (WFC), and Goldman Sachs (GS) have published annual reports that extensively review their ESG approaches and the bottom-line results.


Original Article

https://www.investopedia.com/terms/e/environmental-social-and-governance-esg-criteria.asp

16 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

英阿断臂,难兄难弟/胡逸山博士

上篇谈到拉丁美洲大国阿根廷多年来借外债借到上瘾,尤其是当左派当政时难以自拔地大借特借,而又民粹式地派钱,造成入不敷出,所以周期性地“破产”,但脸皮又够厚,真个如破产的原意般,竟也每次又站了起来重复又借,与染上毒瘾几乎无异。 但上瘾的也不止是阿根廷,还有甘愿即便被“削发”(即收不到利息,甚至收不回本金)也还是要多次提供贷款予阿根廷以及其他一些拉丁美洲所谓“字纸篓案例”国度的跨国大金融机构,即向这些国

庄家割韭菜 当局难控制 散户须做功课自求多福

(吉隆坡15日讯)随着联储局即将降息,热钱可能重返,市场关注股市或再现炒风,不过,专家提醒,庄家也将瞄准时机“割韭菜”,投资者须做好功课,而监管当局也有义务维护市场的公平有序。 监管单位或需加强执法 市场专家表示,早前第一数码(PERTAMA,8532,主板消费产品服务组)从高峰暴跌的例子最明显,长达10个交易日剧烈波动,让市场人士措手不及,似为散户敲响警钟,惟市场观察者认为,要想真的阻吓市场炒风

【南视界】想买股票 这个不得不注意

投资常客相信都明白什么是股票周息率(Dividend Yield),但对于新手来说,这是你必须了解的,不然即使领了钱也不知道钱是从哪里来。 周息率被称为现金股利、配息或分红,一般指上司公司将上一年度的部分获利,以现金或红股形式派发给股东,作为投资收益和回馈股东。周息率是个浮动数字,会随着每日股价的起落,以及派息的增减而有所变动。 这也是常见的股票估值的方法之一,周息率较高的公司一般都是规模和现金流

Comments


bottom of page